Real World DBA

Making Life Easier for SQL Server DBAs

Posts Tagged ‘fragmentation’

Index Rebuild versus Reorganize: What’s the difference?

Posted by mxhxrdba on February 4, 2008

In a nutshell, you should rebuild when an index is over 30% fragmented and reorganize when an index is between 10% and 30% fragmented. If fragmentation is below 10%, you can probably just leave that index alone. Rebuilding takes more server resources (and uses locks unless you use the ONLINE option available in 2005 Enterprise and Development editions), so reorg when possible. Syntax below to rebuild or reorg all indexes on a table named tTable follows…

REBUILD

ALTER INDEX ALL ON dbo.tTable REBUILD
GO

REORGANIZE

ALTER INDEX ALL ON dbo.tTable REORGANIZE
GO

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Indexes – to Rebuild or Reorganize?

Posted by mxhxrdba on January 27, 2008

Index maintenance is one of the best “bang for the buck” performance tuning activities a DBA can perform. Due to factors such as page splits and updates to index and branch leaf pages, index become fragmented, resulting the in index data no longer being physically contiguous. Looking at our available options as far as index maintenance goes, there may be some confusion as whether we should be rebuilding our indexes, or performing an index reorganization. It really depends on their degree of fragmentation.

Microsoft recommends rebuilding if fragmentation is over 30%, reorganizing if it’s between 5% and 30% and leaving it alone if fragmentation is below 5%. In SQL Server 2005, you can use the sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats function to view the fragmentation of an index.

This will get detail for all tables in your DB, returning the three key fields first and ordering by most fragmented:

—————————————————————————————-

SELECT OBJECT_NAME(i.object_id) AS [Table Name],
i.name AS [Index Name],
dm.avg_fragmentation_in_percent, *
FROM sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats(DB_ID(), NULL, NULL, NULL, ‘DETAILED’) dm
INNER JOIN sys.indexes i ON i.object_id = dm.object_id
AND i.index_id = dm.index_id
order by avg_fragmentation_in_percent desc

—————————————————————————————-

To reorganize: ALTER INDEX REORGANIZE –reorgs and repacks the leaf pages of the index; this makes DBCC INDEX DEFRAG obsolete.

To rebuild: ALTER INDEX REBUILD WITH (ONLINE = ON) –drops the index and recreates it; this makes
DBCC DBREINDEX and DBCC INDEX REBUILD obsolete.

Rebuild syntax: ALTER INDEX PKtTable1
ON dbo.tTable1
REBUILD
GO

The (ONLINE = ON) operator allows the index to be rebuilt while the underlying data is accessed by other users (new to SQL 2005).

The following script will rebuild indexes for all tables in your database:

—————————————————————————————-

DECLARE @Database VARCHAR(255)
DECLARE @Table VARCHAR(255)
DECLARE @cmd NVARCHAR(500)
DECLARE @fillfactor INT

SET @fillfactor = 90

DECLARE DatabaseCursor CURSOR FOR
SELECT name FROM master.dbo.sysdatabases
WHERE name = ‘YourDatabaseName’
ORDER BY 1

OPEN DatabaseCursor

FETCH NEXT FROM DatabaseCursor INTO @Database
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN

SET @cmd = ‘DECLARE TableCursor CURSOR FOR SELECT table_catalog + ”.” + table_schema + ”.” + table_name as tableName
FROM ‘ + @Database + ‘.INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES WHERE table_type = ”BASE TABLE”’

– create table cursor
EXEC (@cmd)
OPEN TableCursor

FETCH NEXT FROM TableCursor INTO @Table
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN

– SQL 2000 command
–DBCC DBREINDEX(@Table,’ ‘,@fillfactor)

– SQL 2005 command
SET @cmd = ‘ALTER INDEX ALL ON ‘ + @Table + ‘ REBUILD WITH (FILLFACTOR = ‘ + CONVERT(VARCHAR(3),@fillfactor) + ‘)’
EXEC (@cmd)

FETCH NEXT FROM TableCursor INTO @Table
END

CLOSE TableCursor
DEALLOCATE TableCursor

FETCH NEXT FROM DatabaseCursor INTO @Database
END
CLOSE DatabaseCursor
DEALLOCATE DatabaseCursor

—————————————————————————————-

Now, you may notice that even after rebuilding your indexes, many still show a large percentage of fragmentation. Hint: check out the page_count column of sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats. If it is a small number, SQL Server may have just skipped over this index. This is fine, as fragmentation in small tables/indexes has a minimal hindrance on performance.

Posted in Administration, Indexing, Performance | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »